Real Estate Photography: Here's me realizing there's too many mirrors to shoot video. |
- Here's me realizing there's too many mirrors to shoot video.
- Friendly reminder to turn off the ceiling fan when shooting multi-frame HDR ��
- Looking for any criticism for my photography
- I'm a realtor, suggest a camera+lens!
| Here's me realizing there's too many mirrors to shoot video. Posted: 13 Nov 2020 11:06 AM PST |
| Friendly reminder to turn off the ceiling fan when shooting multi-frame HDR �� Posted: 13 Nov 2020 03:54 PM PST |
| Looking for any criticism for my photography Posted: 13 Nov 2020 11:20 AM PST Hi everyone! I'm a fairly new real estate photographer and I wanted to show you guys the photos I've taken for these four properties. I've gone on many shoots already but these were the four houses that received the most criticism. 1 is the best to 4 is the worst that I've heard from realtors talking about the quality of work put into these houses. Can any of you guys see what I can do better to further myself? Just in case, I am based in Los Angeles, SGV area. Thank you. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/odrt1hemxzd9v9l/AAA9bQymz92RabaXhOK72BMla?dl=0 [link] [comments] |
| I'm a realtor, suggest a camera+lens! Posted: 12 Nov 2020 08:58 PM PST Hey pros I'm a realtor in Ontario and have been a very amateur photographer since my teenage years as a skater with a D300. When I got into real estate I learned a very little bit about HDR photos and got a Tamron 11-16 and traded up my D300 for a D7100 I never get complaints about my photos but know they could be better and I still have a ton to learn. I had a pretty good year and would like to finally get into a full-frame, mirrorless system so I can get a bit more space in each photo for the very tightest rooms and also generally get less complaints that rooms look bigger than they are (the loss of the crop sensor will help a bit with that, right?) I've obviously been using Nikon for a while but I'm not married to that. I've been researching the Z6 or Z5 with a 14-30 or a Sony A7iiii with a 12-24 G or a 16-35, both around the same prices, $4000-4500 CAD. Basically here are my criteria and notes: Price - not an issue. If an extra $1000 on a body/lens would make a huge difference somewhere let me know but I don't need the absolute high end Form factor - smaller and lighter is better. I prefer the look of the Sony and like the ergonomics of Nikon but keen to try something new Video - I don't do any video work but would like to maybe dip my toes into that, maybe do exterior timelapse videos for brokerage ads. Very minor video needs, but could intensify. Lens availability - not a huge deal since I mostly only need wide angle lenses. I'd really just like 2-3 total lenses, 1-2 for work and 1-2 for home/travel/kids. Storage - would prefer SD. The XQD cards on the Z6 is a big turnoff. Tech - The Z6 and 7iii being 2 years old kind of bothers me, though it doesn't seem like they're being replaced anytime soon with something comparable priced. The Z6 is heavily discounted right now and so the same price as the Z5 but has better stats so if I go with Nikon I'm leaning towards that except hate the new memory cards even though I only need 1. The S7iii is old, but still top of its class it seems. My main thoughts are that the Nikon cameras are overall better for photos though the Sony is better on paper. The Z6 has a better screen resolution than the 7iii but probably negligible. Really appreciate any thoughts and discussions on the topic [link] [comments] |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Real Estate Photography. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment