Real Estate Photography: Thanks for answering my previous question, now I have another. Why is Photomatix and Lightroom HDR so bad? |
- Thanks for answering my previous question, now I have another. Why is Photomatix and Lightroom HDR so bad?
- PRICING - Did some market research in NYC trying to figure out what the heck to charge...
- Another “First Shoot” post!
- Photo Size Question
| Posted: 15 Jan 2021 04:10 PM PST I'd like to thank everyone for answering my last question. I'm a new photographer and your advice helped me make the decision to not buy a flash and instead invest in a better lens for the time being. But now I have another question, why is auto HDR so bad and how can I make it better? Below are some photos I took with my EOS RP and a Tokina 11-16. The raw photos were 10MP. These are the 3 unedited bracketed exposures I took. Shot at night using only house lights.. This is what Photomatix was able to come up with. No settings touched and I used the natural preset. My first attempt at hand blending 3 exposures today resulted in this. I know my first attempt isn't perfect but surely its leagues better than what Photomatix was able to create right? The obvious solution is to just hand blend my all my photos. The only problem is that I offer unlimited photos for a flat rate with a fast turnaround and the manual edit took me 10 minutes for an empty room with no windows. The way I've thought of getting around this is using auto HDR for a majority of the photos and hand blend the major features of the home such as the living room, dining room, kitchen and master bed / bath. But looking at these photos the difference in quality is massive. How can I get better quality out of automatically generated HDR images? Different software? Am I taking my exposures wrong? Thanks in advance [link] [comments] |
| PRICING - Did some market research in NYC trying to figure out what the heck to charge... Posted: 15 Jan 2021 10:36 AM PST |
| Posted: 15 Jan 2021 06:51 AM PST Hey everyone, hoping that someone can look through my first shoot and let me know some suggestions on how to improve/constructive criticism. This one was a friend's top floor rental property. I appreciate all the help in advance! [link] [comments] |
| Posted: 15 Jan 2021 03:52 PM PST If I shoot at a smaller Raw file size ( 2736 x 1824 ) vs the largest size ( 5742 x 3648 ) will there be a loss in image quality or not for my intended purposes. My client requests the photos with a max-width of 2024px - for web only. No print. Shooting with a smaller raw size would save me on memory usage and lighten the load in post-editing. [link] [comments] |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Real Estate Photography. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment